@article{PB-VRVis-2020-001,
author = {Horvath, Zsolt and Buttinger-Kreuzhuber, Andreas and Konev, Artem and Cornel, Daniel and Komma, J{\"u}rgen and Bl{\"o}schl, G{\"u}nter and Noelle, Sebastian and Waser, J{\"u}rgen},
title = {Comparison of Fast Shallow-Water Schemes on Real-World Floods},
year = {2020},
journaltitle = {Journal of Hydraulic Engineering},
doi = {10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001657},
url = {https://www.vrvis.at/publications/PB-VRVis-2020-001},
abstract = {Two-dimensional shallow-water schemes on Cartesian grids are amendable for graphics processing units and thus a convenientchoice for fast flood simulations. A comparison of recent schemes and validation of important use cases is essential for developersand practitioners working with flood simulation tools. In this paper, we discuss three state-of-the-art shallow-water schemes: a first-orderupwind scheme, a second-order upwind scheme, and a second-order central-upwind scheme. We analyze the advantages and disadvantagesof each scheme on historical Danube river floods at three regions in Austria. We study the Lobau region as a floodplain with severalsmall channels, the Wachau region with the meandering Danube in a steep valley, and the Marchfeld region located at the river confluenceof March and Danube. The validation case studies show that the second-order schemes provide better estimates of the water levels thanthe first-order scheme. Still, the first order scheme is useful because it offers fast simulations and reasonable results at higher resolutions.The best trade-off between accuracy and computational effort for simulating river floods is provided by the second-order upwind scheme.},
keywords = {Shallow water; Finite volume; Computational fluid dynamics; Partial differential equations; Historical flood; Case study; Validation; Graphics processing unit (GPU)},
}